Wednesday, April 1, 2009
I am reading further into The Well Trained Mind. I came across a portion about public education "without" religion:
"We don't deal in matters of faith, the (public school) teachers explain. We're neutral...
Think about this for a minute. Arguing for the presence of God is generally considered 'bias.' Assuming His absence is usually called 'neutral.' Yet both are statements of faith; both color the teacher's approach to any subject; both make a fundamental assumption about the nature of men and women.
To call this neutrality is intellectual dishonesty...
I don't blame the public schools for sidestepping this issues. In most cases, it is the only measure they can adopt."
I went to public school and I am wondering, how was I taught about the middle ages or the Crusades in any comprehensive form with little more than a reference to "the church" or its teachings? How did I learn about the pilgrims, prohibition, women's suffrage, the rise and then the eventual abolition of slavery in America without my teacher, at least, mentioning how religious ideas influenced these?
I don't know, but know I was "taught" and even tested on these things. I also know that as I study history for myself these days, apart from the white-washed textbooks, I notice religion's influence on almost every major event in history. And, I am coming to the sad conclusion that my public education is even less complete than I thought it was when I decided to home school my kids.
The book goes on to say:
"We aren't arguing that religion should be 'put back' into public schools. We'd just like some honesty: an education that takes no notice of faith is, at the very least, incomplete.
When you're instructing your own child, you have two tasks with regard to religion: to teach your child your own convictions with honesty and diligence, and to study the ways in which other faiths have changed the human landscape."
And, by God's grace, I plan to use the freedom in our home-classroom to do just that, give my kids a more complete education than they'd be offered anywhere else.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Graduate School
Much of my time this week is dedicated to finishing my final paper for my current Rhetoric class for graduate school. This is my work stati...
-
"...the child should have a set time everyday to read for fun. Begin with half an hour for first graders, and build up to an hour of r...
-
Avril finished her astronomer shoeboxes for Challenge B. The Challenge B students have all done research and projects on astronomers thr...
-
Recently, I got to go to an Andrew Peterson concert at the Community Coffehouse in Danbury, CT. My dear friend and I didn't realize t...
2 comments:
I consider myself to have faith , yet do not practice a religion. However, one can not fully understand or appreciate most world history without learning of the religious undercurrents in place during those times. I agree that avoiding the place religion plays in History is a disservice to students everywhere. And while I don't think public schools should teach children to practice religion(there are religious schools for that)- I think children should grow up with an understanding of the role religion plays in the world.
Gina, Well said. I look forward to learning more about other faiths, even different sects of Christianity, which is what we "do," and their influences on the world, past and present, as we study. I love that home school offers this freedom.
Post a Comment